Monday, 26 January 2009

ANTI BNP CAMPAIGN

Being an ex-BNP member I, obviously, keep an eye on what is happening to and within the party, if only for my own information. The latest bout of anti-BNP campaigns involved Harriet Harman warning that 8% of the vote in the North West could see Nick Griffin becoming a MEP. Jon Cruddas (who incidentally has three houses) teaming up with the Communist Searchlight and starting the biggest anti-BNP campaign ever known.
Jon Cruddas joined Harriet Harmon in her speech at the Progressive London conference, here is the guest list….
Dr Muhammad Abdul Bari, General Secretary Muslim Council of BritainCllr Salma Yaqoob, RespectJohn Haylett, political editor Morning StarTony Benn; Jeremy Corbyn MPBell Ribeiro-Addy, NUS Black Students' OfficerKen LivingstoneGeorge Galloway MPSamuel Moncada, Venezuelan AmbassadorInayat BunglawalaBonnie Greer, writer and broadcasterJon Cruddas MP
…A fine cross section of the white working classes if I ever saw one!.
The latest weapon in the armoury is the employment by Searchlight of BLUE STATE DIGITAL, the firm behind Obama’s presidential online campaign. Searchlight have received, for many years, the covert backing and financial support of the Labour Party, Searchlight alone could not afford a company such as BSD so, one wonders, how have Labour fiddled the books to pay for this?.
The point I’m trying to get at is that a few years ago, Searchlight, UAF, the Labour Party, the Conservatives and Lib Dems all said the BNP were not worth worrying about, the BNP have no chance of being elected, the BNP are all racists. It now appears that all that as changed and that the BNP have become the threat that could pull their snouts out of the trough they all feed from. The more organisations that gang-up on the BNP the stronger their resolve becomes, by now I thought these people would have known this. The more Labour tell me not to do something the more inclined I am to actually do it as, I’m sure, are a lot of others. So it will not surprise me to see BNP candidates win some seats in the European Elections, it may well be the case that, as apposed to winning those seats Labour and the rest of the unwashed lefties gave them to the BNP.

14 comments:

Anonymous said...

Having read this post I fail to understand why you left the BNP as you are pushing exactly the same line.

Councillor John Oddy said...

Anon,
I am not “pushing a line” I am merely commenting on how, all of a sudden, the BNP are a real threat to the mainstream parties.
There are a lot of BNP policies that I endorse, there are some I don’t and there are some that are totally unworkable. The vast majority of BNP members that I know are not racists, I do not say there are no racists within the Party but there are racists and pro-racists in all walks of life.
My argument with the BNP had nothing to do with the Party in principle but more with the internal policies and running practices associated with it. I believed that to promote the BNP one had to be out there doing it and showing the people that the BNP was not some shadowy organisation, in doing so this brought me into conflict with certain individuals within the Party who were against my theories, rather than rip apart the Welsh BNP I elected to resign. I could have stayed and fought my corner, I had enough local support, had I done so I feel I would have done more harm than good, even if I’d won, so it was better for the Party and all concerned that I left, which I did. There are those within the Party that have asked me to rejoin and reconsider my position, which, whilst flattering would not be practical because since my departure nothing as change in the overall local make-up of the BNP, in fact it has worsened and I’m getting too old to be a whipping-boy for anybody.

Anti-gag said...

Dear John,

Unfortunately the story you tell in your comment above (not the article)is typical of many good members experience all across the country. We simply have lost, and are still losing, too many good people.

Personally I would appeal to all our members to stay and fight. But I do realise that has to be a personal decision each makes for themselves.

From
Chris Hill
(Lancaster)

Anonymous said...

http://judicial-inc.biz/Sayanim.htm (Just for your interest)

Councillor John Oddy said...

Anon,,
All very Americanised but I get your point.
I lived in Africa for seven years and during my time there got to know all the ex-pats, if they or I had a problem there was always one of us could help sort it out. Just because we did that didn’t mean we wanted to instill our values on the people there, change their democratic process or, indeed, take over their Country. In times of crisis it is natural to turn to your own kind for help and guidance, I cannot fault anybody for doing that.

Anonymous said...

http://www.adelaideinstitute.org/newsletters/n96_97_chapter3.htm (RIGHT AGAIN JOHN ,NOW HOW CAN ANYONE SAY THIS WAS RUSSIAN)

Councillor John Oddy said...

Anon,
An Australian article written by an unknown of author with an obvious hatred of Jews and Communism. I fail to see what the connection is with this blog.
I do understand that you yourself are likeminded to the unknown author and share his hatred. Personally I have no such feelings and, once again, fail to see the significance.
You fail to deliver your input, your suggestions or a thought-out solution. What do you expect of me or the readership of this blog?, do you want us to agree with you, which on the evidence I don’t, or would you prefer we just sat here and accept what you link us to?.
Anon, for any debate it is better to put your own thoughts into words rather than rely on the written words of others. Before you start to fill this blog with anymore links let me tell you I will not publish them but, if you take the time and trouble to put your version down I will gladly debate it, that way if you lack conviction I can argue with your thoughts and not those of twenty-odd authors you link me to.

Anti-gag said...

Dear John,

Can I say that I agree 100% with your new policy of rejecting anonymous links to other sites. That's not a denial of free speech, it's simply rejecting advertising. Also as you say that poster who put their opinions down in their own words will be allowed I don't see how anyone can object.

I've been following that exact line myself, on the Lancaster blog, for the last few days.

Cut and pasting is not an exercise in free-speech, it's advertising.

From
Chris Hill
(Lancaster)

Anonymous said...

Islamization of Europe and The European Union

Fjordman - 2/10/2008

Hugh Fitzgerald of Jihad Watch recently suggested a number of things Europeans can do to halt Islamization. The proposals were good, but I think we should focus on the most important obstacle: the European Union. I've suggested in the past that the EU is the principal motor behind the Islamization of Europe, and that the entire organization needs to be dismantled as soon as possible, otherwise nothing substantial can ever be done about the Muslim invasion. At the Gates of Vienna blog, I am writing a text called "Ten Reasons to Get Rid of the European Union," which can be translated into other languages and be republished when it is completed.

As Bat Ye'or demonstrates in her book Eurabia: The Euro-Arab Axis, senior EU leaders have actively been working for years to merge Europe with the Arab world. They are now feeling confident enough to say this openly. The British Foreign Minister David Miliband in November 2007 stated that the European Union should work towards including Middle Eastern and North African countries, as this would "extend stability." He also said that the EU must "keep our promises to Turkey" regarding EU membership.

The EU involves the free movement of people across borders. If it expands to the Middle East, hundreds of millions of Muslims will have free access to Germany, Italy, France, Britain, Sweden, the Czech Republic and Austria. If Turkey becomes a member, it means that Greeks, Bulgarians and others who have fought against oppression by Ottoman Turks for centuries will now be flooded with Muslims from a rapidly re-Islamizing Turkey. The same goes for Poles, Hungarians, Romanians and others who fought against Muslims for centuries.

The EU's Justice and Security Commissioner Franco Frattini states that Europe must relax its immigration controls and open the door to an extra 20 million "Africans and Asians" during the next two decades. Most of these "Africans and Asians" come from the predominantly Muslim countries of North Africa and the Greater Middle East. The EU thus decided to flood Europe with tens of millions of Muslims at the same time as peaceful Europeans demonstrating against the Islamization of Europe were brutally harassed by the police in the EU capital of Brussels. Frattini has also banned the use of the phrase Islamic terrorism: "People who commit suicide attacks or criminal activities on behalf of religion, Islamic religion or other religion, they abuse the name of this religion." He thinks we shouldn't use the word "immigration," either, we should talk about "mobility."

While Dutch politicians, in what was until recently a peaceful country, have been killed for being too critical of Islam, while Islamic terror attacks have murdered people in London and Madrid, while more terror attacks are planned every single day from Italy via Paris to Denmark, and while people from Sweden to Germany are subject to Muslim street violence and harassment, EU leaders want to increase Europe's Muslim population by tens of millions in a few years. This is criminal and evil, pure and simple.

In Cologne, Germany, a Muslim teenager who wanted to mug a 20-year-old German man was killed in an act of self-defense, according to witnesses. This led to angry protests from Muslims. Apparently, non-Muslims are not supposed to defend themselves from attacks. This violence is usually labelled "crime," but I believe it should more accurately be called Jihad.

Those who know Islamic history, as described in books such as The Truth About Muhammad by Robert Spencer or The Legacy of Jihad by Dr. Andrew G. Bostom, know that looting and stealing the property of non-Muslims has been part and parcel of Jihad from the very beginning. In fact, so much of the behavior of Muhammad and early Muslims could be deemed criminal that it is difficult to know where crime ends and Jihad begins. In the city of Oslo, it is documented that some of the criminal gangs also have close ties to Jihadist groups at home and abroad. As Dutch Arabist Hans Jansen points out, the Koran is seen by some Muslims as a God-given "hunting licence," granting them the right to assault and even murder non-Muslims. It is hardly accidental that while Muslims make up a minority of the population in France, they make up an estimated seventy percent of French prison inmates.

Why would anybody in their right mind want to import Islam, the most destructive force on the planet? Are EU leaders naïve? I don't think so, at least not all of them. You cannot maintain political power in the long run if you are totally naive.
We are told to treat cultural and historical identities as fashion accessories, shirts we can wear and change at will. The Multicultural society is "colorful," an adjective normally attached to furniture or curtains. Cultures are window decorations of little or no consequence, and one might as well have one as the other. In fact, it is good to change it every now and then. Don't you get tired of that old sofa sometimes? What about exchanging it for the new sharia model? Sure, it's slightly less comfortable than the old one, but it's very much in vogue these days and sets you apart from the neighbors, at least until they get one, too. Do you want a sample of the latest Calvin Klein perfume to go with that sharia?

I have heard individuals state point blank that even if Muslims become the majority in our countries in the future, this doesn't matter because all people are equal and all cultures are just a mix of everything else, anyway. And since religions are just fairy-tales, replacing one fairy-tale with another one won't make a big difference. All religions basically say that the same things in different ways. However, not one of them would ever dream of saying that all political ideologies "basically mean the same thing." They simply don't view religious or cultural ideas as significant, and thus won't spend time on studying the largely unimportant details of each specific creed.

In The Suicide of Reason: Radical Islam's Threat to the West, Lee Harris writes that: "What strikes us as irrationalities in the economic systems of Third World nations, such as the red tape documented by [Peruvian economist Hernando] de Soto, is not irrational at all from the point of view of the dominant elite: It is part of what keeps them dominant. With enough red tape, they can stay king of the mountain forever."

This reminds me a great deal of what the EU is doing, attempting to create a permanent oligarchy by keeping the native population in line though a combination of confusion, bureaucracy and intimidation from imported Muslims.

Far from being an irrelevant detail, religion is the heart and blood of any civilization. The greatest change (until now) in my country's history was when we adopted Christianity instead of the Norse religion. This changed the entire fabric of our culture. We became integrated into the mainstream of Western civilization at about the same time as we went from being a tribal society to a genuine state. Maybe Christianity helped in creating the foundations of nation states with an individualistic culture. If so, perhaps changing the religion is beneficial for those who want to replace nation states with authoritarian transnational entities, for instance the European Union. Islamic societies are always authoritarian. Those who want to abolish the democratic system and rule as an unaccountable oligarchy thus naturally prefer Islam.

The EU is an awful organization even if you don't take Muslim immigration into account. Former Soviet dissident Vladimir Bukovksy, who is not particularly preoccupied with Islam, fears that the European Union is on its way to becoming another Soviet Union: "The sooner we finish with the EU the better. The sooner it collapses the less damage it will have done to us and to other countries."

The brilliant French political thinker Montesquieu advocated that the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of government should be assigned to different bodies, each of them not powerful enough alone to impose its will on society. This is because "constant experience shows us that every man invested with power is apt to abuse it, and to carry his authority as far as it will go." This separation of powers is almost totally absent in the EU, where there is weak to non-existent separation between the legislative, the executive and the judicial branches, and where all of them function more or less without the consent of the public.

As Montesquieu warned, "When the legislative and executive powers are united in the same person, or in the same body of magistrates, there can be no liberty; because apprehensions may arise, lest the same monarch or senate should enact tyrannical laws, to execute them in a tyrannical manner." He also stated that "Useless laws weaken the necessary laws." The problem with the EU is not just the content of laws, but their volume. Law-abiding citizens are turned into criminals by laws regulating speech and behavior, while real criminals rule the streets. This will either lead to a police state, to a total breakdown in law and order, or both.

At least two conditions must be fulfilled in order to prevent the arbitrary use of power. The first one is a system of formal checks and balances, giving the possibility of peacefully removing officials who are not doing their job. The second is transparency, so people know what their representatives are doing. The EU deliberately ignores both these conditions, but especially the latter. Vast quantities of power have been transferred to shady backrooms and structures the average citizen hardly knows exist. Eurabia was created through such channels.

The pompous former French president Valéry Giscard d'Estaing declared that the creation of the proposed EU Constitution was Europe's "Philadelphia moment," alluding to the Philadelphia Convention or Constitutional Convention in the newly formed the United States of America in 1787. The USA has its flaws, but if Mr. Giscard d'Estaing had actually understood the American Constitution, he would have discovered that James Madison, Thomas Jefferson and others took great care to implement a number of checks and balances in the new state, precisely what is lacking in the EU. The American constitution is relatively short and understandable, whereas the EU Constitution is hundreds of pages long, largely incomprehensible and displays an almost sharia-like desire to regulate all aspects of human life. After it was rejected by Dutch and French voters, the Constitution has been renamed and is now being smuggled through the back door.

Madison, Jefferson, George Washington and the American Founding Fathers acted in the open and were generally elected by their peers and applauded for their actions. Contrast this with Jean Monnet, who is credited with having laid the foundations of the EU, despite the fact that most EU citizens haven't heard of him. He was never elected to any public office, but worked behind the scenes to implement a secret agenda. I read an interview with a senior Brussels lobbyist who dubbed Monnet "the most successful lobbyist in history." To this day, the EU capital of Brussels is dominated by lobbyists. The Americans in Washington D.C. have their fair share of lobbyists, too, and this can be problematic at times. The difference is that the EU capital is dominated ONLY by lobbyists and unelected bureaucrats, with little real popular influence. Those who read the excellent British blog EU Referendum regularly will know that this secretive modus operandi is still very much alive in the European Union.

Frankly, I don't think the EU has the right to use the term "European." Those inhabiting the European continent are first and foremost Germans, Dutchmen, Poles, Italians, Hungarians, Portuguese etc. "Europe" has existed mainly to protect the continent against Islamic expansionism. Charles Martel created Europe when he defeated the Arab invasion in the seventh century, aided by people such as Pelayo, who started the Reconquista in the Iberian Peninsula, John Hunyadi and Lazar of Serbia who fought against the Turks in the Balkans and John III Sobieski, King of Poland, who beat the Ottomans during the 1683 Battle of Vienna. The EU is actively trying to undo everything Charles Martel and these men achieved. This makes it the anti-European Union, an evil organization with no moral legitimacy whatsoever.

The EU is gradually reducing the indigenous people of an entire continent to the likely future status of second-rate citizen in their own countries. It is quite possibly the greatest betrayal in the history of European civilization since the fall of the Roman Empire, yet it is hailed as a "peace project" in the media. It is shameful to witness the bullying displayed by EU leaders vis-à-vis the Serbs, who are being forced to give up their land to Muslim thugs. This template will eventually be used against all Europeans. As Srdja Trifkovic warns, even if the Serbs are robbed of Kosovo, Muslims will not thank the West:

"In Europe most nations want to defend themselves—even the ultra-tolerant Dutch have seen the light after Theo van Gogh's murder—but cannot do so because they are hamstrung by a ruling class composed of guilt-ridden self-haters and appeasers. Their hold on the political power, the media, and the academe is undemocratic, unnatural, obscene. If Europe is to survive they need to be unmasked for what they are: traitors to their nations and their culture. If Europe is to survive, they must be replaced by people ready and willing to subject the issues of immigration and identity to the test of democracy, unhindered by administrative or judicial fiat. For those reasons too, Serbia must not give up Kosovo. By giving it up it would encourage the spirit that seeks the death of Europe and its surrender to the global totalitarianism of Muhammad's successors. Not for the first time, in Kosovo the Serbs are fighting a fight that is not theirs alone."

Some hope we can keep the "positive" aspects of the EU and not "throw out the baby with the bath water." I beg to differ. The EU is all bath water, no baby. The EU got off on the wrong path from its very inception, and is now so flawed that it simply cannot be reformed. Appeasement of Islam is so deeply immersed in the structural DNA of the EU that the only way to stop the Islamization of Europe is to dismantle the European Union. All of it.

Fjordman is a noted Norwegian blogger who has written for many conservative web sites. He used to have his own Fjordman Blog in the past, but it is no longer active

Councillor John Oddy said...

Anon,
I take it that you are against the EU too, then???.

Anonymous said...

You are right again John there is no fooling you!!!
I am totally oppossed to the so called EU, plus the Union of Mexico,USA and Canada and the Asian Block. These are the building blocks with globalisation the goal being a One World Government. What I really object to is the people who have schemed for this goal. In order to have an EU you must have the sway or the power in each individual European country.
Around the time I came out of the army I had the global plot explainend to me. I hardly understood a word, but to cut a long story short I investigated the facts as to who is behind this diabolical plot. You have to look at history, what we have been told is far different to actual facts.
The names and organisations are under our very noses and have been for hundred's of years. The astonishing thing is any reference books are banned in public libraries and the likes of WH Smiths etc(long before any so called hate laws came into being) You have heard of the burning of books, this is the banning of books, but thanks to the internet you can gain access to some writings hence the cut and paste.
You can call the masters of this swindle, Zionists or so called jews if you want. To gain insight into what motivates them, read there books they have a totally different perspective on life, with their Talmudic laws, which keep them more disciplined than any battalion of guardsmen on parade (quite incredible actually). I am not an impressionable person, I only deal with facts not opinions
The first thing I learnt was that these are not biblical jews from the Old Asia Minor they are converts from Asia hence I use the term so called as they have no blood ties they are mainly atheists who have mastered the survival technique. No doubt you find already that what I am saying is quite shocking as it was to me at the time, but far cleverer men in history have said the same thing - the evidence is abundant.

Anonymous said...

All very Americanised but I get your point.
I lived in Africa for seven years and during my time there got to know all the ex-pats, if they or I had a problem there was always one of us could help sort it out. Just because we did that didn’t mean we wanted to instill our values on the people there, change their democratic process or, indeed, take over their Country. In times of crisis it is natural to turn to your own kind for help and guidance, I cannot fault anybody for doing that.
VERY NOBLE THOUGHTS JOHN BUT YOUR JUDGING OTHER GROUPS BY YOUR VALUES NOT THERE'S (I HAVE LIVED IN AFRICA TO)

Anonymous said...

I am not “pushing a line” I am merely commenting on how, all of a sudden, the BNP are a real threat to the mainstream parties.
I AM NOT A MEMBER OF THE BNP, I SUPPORT THEM. TIME IS NOT ON OUR SIDE. I SUGGEST YOU FORGET ABOUT PERSONALITIES AND DIFFERENT POINT'S OF VIEW AS THERE IS NO OTHER OPTION OR PARTY AT THIS STAGE. ANYONE WHO IS ANTI IMMIGRATION AND EU WILL HAVE HAD MORE THAN HOLOCAUST DENIER, FACIST AND NAZI THROWN AT THEM. NEVER BE IMTIMIDATED OR FRIGHTENED OF NAME CALLING IT IS ONLY A WORD. THE MORE IT IS USED THE MORE IMPOTENT IT BECOMES AND WOULD ADVISE YOU TO RECONSIDER AND REJOIN AS THERE IS NO OTHER OPTION IF ADVANCES ARE NOT MADE IN THE NEXT 5 YEARS THEN THERE IS NO CHANCE.

Councillor John Oddy said...

Anon,
I have allowed you first three posting to be published, the other 15 I have not, although I am reading them, which will take some time.
I do have a few of questions for you, on a more personal nature. When and where were you in Africa?. Have you ever worked as a security contractor/CPU?. Do you know the name Jawarah and have you ever worked for him or me?. Are your initials C.W.?.
You say you are not a member of the BNP, is that through choice or job restriction?, if it’s through choice then why ask me to re-join when you, yourself, are not a member?.
In my time in the BNP I had to put-up with a lot more than name calling and I was certainly not frightened or intimidated, not part of my nature to be either of those descriptions!.